In most cases, test tables list types of input data. This information may be enough to start running tests on some software applications. Again, you can get a general idea of ​​what will be tested, without having to seek for additional information.

The test table helps to track crucial data, including test input, expected results and test status. The use of abbreviations in the documentation makes it possible to include more important information in the table. Abbreviations allow you to reduce the amount of information written for each test case, but do not make it possible to reduce the number of test cases to be executed. Testing software services may be helpful for you to check your app (s) for usability, performance, security and so on to ensure its (their) correct operation on a variety of platforms.

It is not bad to use abbreviations, considering that all previous testing work could be haphazard, chaotic, undocumented and non-reproducible. The main philosophy of book on testing is that it is better to have at least some documentation than not to have it at all. The documentation is used as a basis for starting out the testing activities, and, as a result, the testing process will be ultimately improved. Software performance testing services let enterprises get rid of performance bottlenecks in IT products and make them work as intended.

With each abbreviation, emphasis is placed on the various levels of detail.

Each block is checked to determine if the testing passed or failed.
Keyboard combinations used to run tests are recorded.
The real results are recorded.
Successfully completed tests are marked as passed, and for the tests that failed, the problem report numbers are recorded.
Recording and saving methods are combined using previous abbreviations by recording any information that is considered important.

Example: Abbreviation No. 1

Method: each block is checked to determine if the test passed or failed.

In table X each successful test is marked with letter P. The failed tests are marked with letter F, and empty cells correspond to tests that were not performed. Certainly, instead of check mark and a cross, you can use the words “passed” and “failed”. This makes it possible to see immediately which tests were run.

If the test is repeated, the tester can record the results of subsequent tests above previous records or color markings.

Benefits. There is a record of what situations and conditions were implemented. It is easy to see which tests passed and which ones failed. Outsourced testing services contribute to lowering expenses associated with software development without sacrificing quality.
Disadvantages. There is no record of the actual input values ​​used or of the expected and observed results. You cannot reproduce the test, because the initial state and keys used for input are not recorded. There is no clear definition of the expected results and, therefore, the tester decides if the test passed or failed.