Ukraine Office: +38 (063) 50 74 707

USA Office: +1 (212) 203-8264

contact@testmatick.com

Manual Testing

Ensure the highest quality for your software with our manual testing services.

Mobile Testing

Optimize your mobile apps for flawless performance across all devices and platforms with our comprehensive mobile testing services.

Automated Testing

Enhance your software development with our automated testing services, designed to boost efficiency.

Functional Testing

Refine your application’s core functionality with our functional testing services

VIEW ALL SERVICES 

Discussion – 

0

Discussion – 

0

Best Libraries That Are Used in Test Automation

Best-Libraries-That-Are-Used-in-Test-Automation

Assertions that have been qualitatively designed constitute the most expressive and evocative part of the test.

[highlight dark=”no”]It’s an assertion that verifies that software works in the way that a user and a client expect.[/highlight]

Qualitative assertions should express the test’s task from the first line.

[highlight dark=”no”]Automation tests should never contain cycles that hide assertions inside.[/highlight]

Many of today’s libraries support the assertions based on popular programming languages.

You may think: what is the point of studying numerous libraries if you can use one and prepare automation tests on the basis of one established script?

The answer is simple: assertions that are easily read is the simplest way of creating assertions in a clearer and more accessible way.

There are 2 approaches to writing asserts. First: using the “asserts” keyword, second – using the “should” and “expect” words.

When the first one originates from a classical method of writing unit tests and focuses its attention on testing and verification, the second one (BDD) is completely oriented at such word combinations as “should” and “expect”, that describe the software behavior that is completely expected by a tester.

And now let’s analyze the structure of popular libraries that can be used in the everyday activity of an automated tester.

Hamcrest

http://hamcrest.org/

It’s probably the most popular library from this field of software automation testing.

The main method used in it is called assertThat().

An Example of Hamcrest Usage

An Example of Hamcrest Usage

It’s great that this library can offer various matchers, for example:

An Example of Matchers in Hamcrest

An Example of Matchers in Hamcrest

You can find more information about this library here: https://code.google.com/p/hamcrest/wiki/Tutorial

FestAsserts

https://joel-costigliola.github.io/assertj/assertj-core-migrating-from-fest.html

It’s a popular Java library that gives personal access to write assertions.

It’s aimed at increasing the readability of a test script and simplifying the process of test execution.

An Example of FestAsserts Usage

An Example of FestAsserts Usage

By the way, this library is very similar to the first one since it offers numerous matchers.

For example, to test that the X list contains certain elements.

AssertJ

https://joel-costigliola.github.io/assertj/

It’s a classical branch of the above-mentioned Fest Asserts library that offers numerous assertions, error messages, and this gives the possibility to improve the readability of a test software code.

An Example of AssertJ Usage

An Example of AssertJ Usage

More details about this library can be found here: http://joel-costigliola.github.io/assertj/

An Example of Google Truth Usage

An Example of Google Truth Usage

Google Truth

It’s easily read and is clearer than the other three tools.

Conclusion

Therefore, Hamcrest and FestAssert are very important if you use a Java-based BDD approach but Hamcrest is more flexible and scalable; at the same time, Fest Assert has a simple syntax and can be easily used by a common user.

As for AssertJ, this library is a simpler version of FestAssert, that has numerous useful functionalities.

But in general, all the above-mentioned libraries are good for creating simple and working unit tests while performing automated software testing.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Encapsulation as One of the Fundamental Principles of Object-Oriented Programming

Encapsulation as One of the Fundamental Principles of Object-Oriented Programming

Knowing the basics of object-oriented programming is necessary not only for programmers, but also, of course, for testers who interact with program code, study it, or write it. Insight into programming fundamentals enables QA experts to better understand the program behavior, give effective recommendations on how to improve the structure of program code, and, more efficiently create autotest code.

Test Automation Strategies That Really Work

Test Automation Strategies That Really Work

An approach to the development and implementation of automated tests for an application-in-test depends on numerous factors. A size and complexity of an application, a structure of a project team, instantly appearing deadlines, requirements for security, and many other details define the most suitable strategy. Further, we will describe some working strategies that can be helpful for any project that requires automation.

Using Test Retries as a Method to Hide Bugs

Using Test Retries as a Method to Hide Bugs

Every tester is in some way familiar with the concept of randomly failing automated tests. An analysis of the results of these tests can be really time-consuming and some teams prefer running tests once again if they fail. But is this efficient? The answer is not as obvious and clear as it seems.