Ukraine Office: +38 (063) 50 74 707

USA Office: +1 (212) 203-8264

contact@testmatick.com

Manual Testing

Ensure the highest quality for your software with our manual testing services.

Mobile Testing

Optimize your mobile apps for flawless performance across all devices and platforms with our comprehensive mobile testing services.

Automated Testing

Enhance your software development with our automated testing services, designed to boost efficiency.

Functional Testing

Refine your application’s core functionality with our functional testing services

VIEW ALL SERVICES 

Discussion – 

0

Discussion – 

0

Is The Automation Good or Bad?

Is-The-Automation-Good-or-Bad

Is the process of automation really beneficial? When is it appropriate to automate test cases? We would say that is not necessarily beneficial. For example, sometimes manual testing may be more suitable. Thus, if the application’s user interface must be changed significantly very soon, you’ll have to rewrite the automation. Moreover, it can take too much time to create test automation. Manual testing is more useful for brief periods. It is a better option if an application has too strict time limits, and the test automation is not available.

Nevertheless, automation has its particular strengths to enhance the long-term effectiveness of testing processes.

This kind of test supports:

  • Common regression testing
  • Fast feedback to the software engineers at the time of development
  • Almost limitless iterations of the test case realization
  • Specialized reports on the malfunctions of application
  • Support for Agile and eXtreme development techniques
  • Organized documentation of test cases
  • Search of flaws made during manual testing

Test Automation for Internet Apps

The most of modern computer applications are designed as web apps that must be used in an Web browser. The efficiency of these applications is different for different companies and organizations. In our time of constantly developing computer processes, such as eXtreme programming (XP) and Agile, one can say that streamlined testing and methods of quality guarantee are not sufficiently developed in most companies. Software tests are frequently realized manually.

Sometimes they can be efficient. But there are alternatives to the manual testings that many quality assurance team don’t know or aren’t able to perform. In most cases, they can significantly increase the effectiveness of their software production. Test automation is a good solution that suggests using a tool to repeat the tests of the target application as necessary.

Test automation has a lot of benefits, many of which concern the repeatability of the tests and the speed of their realization.

There are many commercial and open source instruments for improving the development of test automation. Selenium is probably the most widespread of them. Our guide will help all the users of Selenium to find out some effective means of developing test automation  for Internet applications.

0 Comments

You May Also Like

Encapsulation as One of the Fundamental Principles of Object-Oriented Programming

Encapsulation as One of the Fundamental Principles of Object-Oriented Programming

Knowing the basics of object-oriented programming is necessary not only for programmers, but also, of course, for testers who interact with program code, study it, or write it. Insight into programming fundamentals enables QA experts to better understand the program behavior, give effective recommendations on how to improve the structure of program code, and, more efficiently create autotest code.

Test Automation Strategies That Really Work

Test Automation Strategies That Really Work

An approach to the development and implementation of automated tests for an application-in-test depends on numerous factors. A size and complexity of an application, a structure of a project team, instantly appearing deadlines, requirements for security, and many other details define the most suitable strategy. Further, we will describe some working strategies that can be helpful for any project that requires automation.

Using Test Retries as a Method to Hide Bugs

Using Test Retries as a Method to Hide Bugs

Every tester is in some way familiar with the concept of randomly failing automated tests. An analysis of the results of these tests can be really time-consuming and some teams prefer running tests once again if they fail. But is this efficient? The answer is not as obvious and clear as it seems.