Upon completion of a quality risk analysis, we know what we need to test. We understand the hazards to system quality that threaten the success of the project as well as their relative importance. This understanding cannot be overemphasized, because without it our testing efforts will become unmatched with quality and can easily result in a reckless waste of time, money and programming effort, mislead management and create unnecessary concern and anxiety for it. In order to properly align the testing sub-project, it is necessary to adequately cover these risks using well-designed test cases. To make a good tester, you need to learn how to design and develop test cases, test data, testing tools and other components of the test system.
Nevertheless, it would be reasonable to skip some important steps if you started to design and develop a test system now. After a quality risk analysis is completed, you will understand the risks that pose a threat to system quality. However, on successful projects, the workgroup finds right balance between quality, system features, budget and schedule. If we assume that the results of the quality risk analysis are carved out of stone and declare that all recommended testing actions and high priority quality risks must be covered, it is possible to unacceptably increase risks for features, budget and schedule. For example, if it takes too long to complete all testing activities in a project, the project will run beyond budget, scope and deadlines. If you want to pay less for quality assurance and testing services you are welcome to collaborate with offshore qa specialists. These people are able to solve any technical task and at that you will be provided with credible and accurate results.
The resource assessment process or evaluation process. This process describes the mechanism by which your test efforts are aligned with timings and budget of the project. In the course of the process, you switch between looking at “what needs to be tested” to “what can be really tested” within the framework of the project. During this process, it is often necessary to remove certain activities, resources, tasks from the scope of your test sub project due to the cost. While doing so, you may use the hierarchy determined in quality risk assessment, as your net, to identify the most crucial quality risks and deemphasize the least crucial.
Comments are closed.
